US Court finds remote-storage DVRs don't infringe on fair use

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that the protections granted by the landmark Betamax case apply even when a TV recording is stored remotely

The US Second Circuit Appellate court has ruled that a DVR which stores programs on a remote server did not infringe on fair use mandates.

The ability to record television for viewing at a later time, known as 'time-shifting' has long been a legally protected right in the US, thanks to a Supreme Court decision from the so-called 'Betamax' case.

DVRs are protected under this decision, as while the technology has changed the intent remains the same.

But when US company Cablevision announced plans to introduce a DVR with remote storage where content will be kept on hard drives at Cablevision offices, a collection of movie studios and networks sued the company.

The plaintiffs claimed a remote storage DVR was not covered by the Betamax case as Cablevision was making the copy rather than users.

They also claimed that if 1,000 viewers were to use the Cablevision box to record a television episode and play it back at a later date, that would qualify as a public performance, which would not be covered under Fair Use guidelines.

The original court ruled for the plaintiffs, but the appellate court has overturned this ruling, stating that there is no difference in principle wherever the data is stored.

The court also held that users were responsible for recording and playing back data, so Cablevision's service would not classify as a public performance.

Join the Good Gear Guide newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.

Our Back to Business guide highlights the best products for you to boost your productivity at home, on the road, at the office, or in the classroom.

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.
Show Comments

Most Popular Reviews

Deals on Good Gear Guide

Deals on Good Gear Guide

Latest News Articles


GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy


First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni


For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell


The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi


The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott


My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.


Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?