Green500 list ranks most energy-efficient supercomputers

Virginia Tech professors set to reveal energy needs of machines on latest Top500 List

The world's top supercomputers may be performance powerhouses, but they're also energy hogs, often using enough power to light up a small city.

Such power consumption prompted two professors at the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University to come up with a way to commend companies that build energy-efficient supercomputers. Kirk Cameron and Wu Feng, both associate professors in the university's computer science department, are preparing to release the Green500 List of the most energy-efficient supercomputer installations in the world.

"The list is meant to encourage people to develop systems that use power efficiently," said Cameron. "If you do that, you decrease costs, which are really high -- between US$800,000 and $1 million a year per megawatt. It's ridiculously expensive. You're looking at US$1 million to $4 million a year, easily, to run a mega system."

The Green500 List is a rating of the energy efficiency of machines that make the Top500 List of supercomputers, a ranking of the most powerful supercomputers in the world. The 30th installment of the biannual Top500 List is slated to be issued on November 14 at the Supercomputing Conference in Nevada.

The Green500 List is expected to be released just a few days after the Top500 List, giving the researchers time to rank any newcomers.

Cameron said he and Feng have put together a make-shift green list for the past few years, but it only rated some of the supercomputers ranked on the Top500 List, and then only rated them by their peak performance numbers.

This year's list, he said, really marks its official coming out, with its attempt to rank every machine on the Top500 List. They have asked users of the Top500 machines to provide measurements based on a standard workload. Cameron explained that they hope to receive detailed information from about 100 of the supercomputers -- calculating energy consumption, heat output and efficiency using the power the machine is consuming.

Machines at user sites that don't provide the requested data will be measured by peak performance numbers. Researchers will give preference to the supercomputers that they have working data on, according to Cameron.

So, which supercomputers do the researchers find tend to be more efficient?

Cameron said the machines that use blade servers tend to be much more energy efficient than machines that cluster a bunch of servers together. He noted that the Earth Simulator, a NEC vector supercomputer being run in Japan, uses a lot of energy, producing 5.12 MFLOPS per watt. IBM's BlueGene supercomputer, which currently sits at the head of the Top500 List, does not use blades but still produces a more efficient 187.79 MFLOPS per watt.

"I think companies will start to focus on more efficient machines because if you want to get more performance, it has to be more efficient," said Cameron. "If not, it's self-limiting. You can't build a machine that needs its own power plant... Being green may just be a popular term that may fade, but energy efficiency is good business. And that should have meaning to an IT manager. Two machines can have the same performance, but if one uses half the power, then choosing that one is a business decision."

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Sharon Gaudin

Computerworld

Comments

Comments are now closed.

Latest News Articles

Most Popular Articles

Follow Us

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Resources

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?