NY woman sues Apple, Jobs over iPhone price cut

She wants US$1M in compensatory damages and punitive damages on top of that

A woman from New York sued Apple last week over the iPhone, saying that the company broke several laws when it cut the price of the device last month by US$200 and then issued a US$100 credit to some owners.

It was the first known lawsuit resulting from the 33 percent price cut, which raised a ruckus among iPhone users and forced Apple CEO Steve Jobs to apologize for how Apple had treated loyal customers.

In a complaint filed September 24 with a New York federal court, Dongmei Li accused Apple, Jobs and Apple's wireless partner, AT&T, of price discrimination, discrimination in offering rebates versus credits, underselling, unfair and deceptive practices, and other violations of federal laws.

Li, who said she had stood in line "for hours" on July 2 -- three days after the iPhone went on sale -- to buy an iPhone, claimed that Apple practiced price discrimination between early and later buyers when it cut the price of the 8GB model from US$599 to US$399 last month. "Apple's discrimination in price between early and later purchasers substantially caused the early purchasers to be injured because early purchasers cannot resell their iPhones for the same profit as later purchasers," Li's lawsuit stated.

Her suit also dinged Apple for giving some iPhone owners -- those who bought between August 22 and September 4 -- a US$200 refund on the higher price they'd paid for their phones, while offering earlier customers a US$100 in-store credit. As part of its price-protection policy, Apple did refund US$200 to people who bought an iPhone in the two weeks leading up to Jobs' surprise September 5 price cut announcement.

The lawsuit also accuses Apple of abandoning the lower-priced 4GB iPhone, the model that Li bought; locking early buyers into a two-year contract with AT&T, something later purchasers could conceivably skip by using one of several unlock hacks; and selling the iPhone at a loss.

Li's suit seeks compensatory damages of US$1 million, plus punitive damages to be accessed by at trial.

Apple officials were not available for comment.

Join the Good Gear Guide newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.
Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Gregg Keizer

Computerworld

Most Popular Reviews

Follow Us

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Shopping.com

Latest News Articles

Resources

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Latest Jobs

Shopping.com

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?